Division of Treatment between Sunderland General and Newcastle RVI.
Basic principles:
Every 2 months, or so, I get a check-up at Newcastle RVI. Just the basics, weight, breathing, diet, physiotherapy, chest, general well being.
Once a month my Port-A-Cath is flushed out by my nurse practitioner
Over the course of a year, in a somewhat random fashion I fall victim to colds, the flu, lots of other virii, minor chest infections and major chest infections. About 90% of these are treated by my nurse practitioner.
In practise:
I do question, to some extent the value of an all-in-one-room CF clinic in which a number of people with chest infections go every 2 months to infect each other. I almost always come out of CF clinic with an extra cough or wheeze. For a time line of “how i am doing” though I do understand it. I feel now that the management of my condition is much improved because of the access I have to my nurse practitioner.
If I don't feel well my first point of contact is my nurse practitioner. On most occasions she will come out to my home to do some further assessment, then discuss with me (if any is needed) treatment options. For minor drugs she calls my GP who then provides me with a prescription, for major drugs, or some of them, she liases with doctors at Sunderland General who authorise provision of them through the hospital inpatient pharmacy. I am very happy and comfortable with this treatment, I don't have to visit hospital (my worst nightmare) to gain treatment and I get to deal with someone I have come to trust.
The problems:
It all comes down to money. I don't really know the ins and outs of how NHS money is separated and spread around (though I would quite like to), but it appears that Sunderland and Newcastle have completely separate budgets. Currently, neither are happy to provide the services I use although there is a nervous status quo in place at the moment.
At Newcastle:
We don't “do” home treatment.
The RVI CF clinic does not do any home visit treatment, from what I can tell because of policy and monetary reasons, its just “not the way they do things”. When I first started attending this clinic every effort was made on there part for me to completely separate from Sunderland and any treatment which I received from them. This wasn't something I was, or am, willing to do. I feel that the relationship I have developed with my nurse practitioner is one of the main reasons I am currently quite in control of my condition. If every time I felt unwell I had to make a trip to hospital, a place which I hate, I would hold off from having treatment for as long as possible (this is something which happened regularly in the past before home treatment started). Funding has been cited as a reason for needing to keep my treatment “in house” by the specialist CF nurse at the RVI (who may be funded by the CF trust but im not sure?), I am not willing to compromise my treatment to give in to government bureaucracy though. Recently there has been some talk of the RVI getting funding for some kind of replacement for my nurse practitioner. On further investigation I have found that they would be permanently based at the RVI and would not offer any of the flexibility patients like myself have. Through all of this, I am often reminded of government buzzwords about patient choice. If this really did exist, instead of the hospital taking the “this is how we do it” approach, they would be taking the “what do you consider is the best approach” route.
At Sunderland:
We don't “do” Newcastle patients.
The management at Sunderland hate me, and other legacy CF patients. Being registered at Newcastle they receive no direct funding for providing me with the service of a home visit nurse practitioner or strong anti-biotic drugs. I don't consider myself a patient of the RVI, I consider myself a patient of the NHS. National insurance goes into the NHS, treatment comes out of it, from where it is required. There has been an on-going battle between the nurse practitioners who treat people like me, and are happy to treat people like me knowing they have a very positive impact on my quality of life, and there managers back home. This constant uncertainty is extremely unsettling, and knowing you are no more than a number to the people who run the hospital is very demoralising.
We don't “do” drugs, even when doctor thinks you need them.
Over the last year and a half, a new treatment was offered to me. A drug called Meropenum which costs more, is stronger and has much worse side-effects than my normal serious chest infection drugs. On the plus side, after a good few weeks recovery it leaves me feeling amazing. We've decided after quite a bit of discussion that it would probably be a good idea at present for me to have Meropenum once a year (probably around September to get me through the start of Winter) and continue with Ceftazadime for the rest of the year. Sunderland however, has a very specific policy on prescribing Meropenum. Unless you can produce a sputum or cough swap sample with the psuedemonus bacteria on, they will not prescribe the drug to you. This is a big problem for me, I almost never cough sputum up, and cough swabs don't really get bugs from deep down in the chest, so even though I know I need treatment and am ill, and my nurse/specialist know I need injections, the hospital refuse to give it to me. This brings us back to Newcastle.
At Newcastle:
We don't “do” unmade medication.
From the age of 7, right up to 18 we have prepared my own antibiotics. Drugs come in a pure/non made-up state which we mix and prepare up into syringes ready to be injected. We are competent and happy to do this, it gives us reassurance that the right drugs have gone into the syringe, and gives me direct control of the speed I put the drugs in at. Control is good. At Newcastle, they “don't do it that way” and have “never done it that way”, they employ a group of pharmacists who do nothing but make up drugs like mine all day into things called infusion bags. The bag attaches to the port and the drug drips in very slowly, taking about 20 minutes for each injection, doing it myself it takes less than 20 minutes for a whole set of injections. I could see no good reason for me to change to this system, it usually takes a bit of fighting for but I do get pure drugs from Newcastle eventually, even though they keep trying to persuade me otherwise. Newcastle as it happens, doesnt have a Meropenum policy, and if your doctor says you need it, you get it
I have heard through the grapevine of a service which another area offers its patients, the perfect service. Instead of giving you pre-made up infusion bags, they make your drugs up for you into the syringes that we do at home and you just get them and inject them. If one area can do this, all areas should be able to do this.
We don't “do” efficiency
We often get things we don't need or want when getting drugs provided from the RVI. The last time I got my drugs from there we were given a huge box of Sodium Chloride. The SC were contained in weird soft plastic bags which were actually designed to be used on a drip (we just get viles from Sunderland), they also contained 300ml when I only needed 100ml per session so I was wasting 66% of the bag every use. To get the stuff out, you had to push a needle through a small plastic tube at the bottom of the bag, except they never just went in, thus lots of burst bags and stabbed fingers. We only used half the box, they are a health hazard and a waste of money, why one hospital can provide standard viles and another cant is beyond me.
The Solutions:
A CF clinic at Sunderland General would be a good solution. Its much easier for me to get too, and would mean a much smoother transition from child to adult clinic, who knows if this will happen though.
Clinics need to be cut down to an individual level, I accept the need for them for monitoring purposes but I don't feel they are good places to be especially related to cross-infection. In all other walks of life people with CF are told to stay as far away from each other as possible.
Drug supply needs to be location independent. If it is better for me to obtain drugs from a certain hospital, even if I don't clinic there, I should be able to, and they should receive payment for drugs as appropriate.
The system of nurse practitioners should be at least kept, at best extended. My nurse practitioner is probably the only other person involved in my care apart from my GP who I really trust with my health.
Just give me what I need. I can tell the hospital exactly how much of each drug and flush I need for each dose, so why give me 3 times the amount I need? When things like this happen, and then other care is refused due to finance costs it makes your blood boil.